In Tuesday's morning note I wrote:
"As you've noticed, the Middle East conflict has heated back up markedly of late; interesting that risk assets, while taking somewhat of a hit last week (which may have been more about AI concerns than it was about Iran worries), have overall been holding up, I'd say remarkably well.Well, while there were a couple of heavyweight outlook concerns expressed last evening, the market action this morning is hinting that oil "sub-100ish" may indeed go some distance in terms of explaining the relative sanguineness we've noticed in markets of late... I.e., as I type, global equities, save for those energy and healthcare (a presently meaningful weight in our core allocation)-related, along with precious metals and bonds are getting pretty well-hammered, as Brent crude is fetching $100.16/barrel (+6.1% on the morning), while WTI is trading at $91.40 (+4.6%).. Those are big one-day % moves, and, clearly, markets have noticed.
We can speculate whether, as is often the case, that's due to the sense that, as scary as they often seem, markets conclude that modern-day geopolitical frictions (even when they're kinetic) don't end up moving the needle as one might expect -- or is it that, in this instance, as long as the price of oil stays, say, sub-100ish, current general conditions are sufficiently positive to absorb the cost? Or is it the legitimate belief/understanding that the US administration will aggressively calm the waters if/when markets begin to crack -- thus leaving investors sanguine, and unwilling to capitulate to scary headlines?"