"The 164k new jobs number was still fine and I suspect reflects an historically low labor pool more than it does a lack of job openings. In fact – while some pause among employers related to trade risks (as cited in the ISMs) could be a factor – the rate of weekly jobless claims (45-year low and record number of weeks below 300k) and the actual job openings number in the JOLTS report (which suggests that the LFP decline is more about new retirees than it is wannabe workers giving up) firmly supports the low labor pool thesis."Here's from Bloomberg's highlight of this morning's release of that JOLTS (Job Openings Labor Turnover Survey) report: emphasis mine...
JOLTS
|
Openings in this report have been well ahead of hirings suggesting that there are more jobs than workers.
No comments:
Post a Comment