So let’s think through why such news might have the bulls all giddy. For starters, it kinda makes sense given how the infamous US/China trade dispute was the source of a fair amount of market volatility over roughly the two years leading up to the current recession. But to presume that even in the off-(zero)-chance they come out of next week’s talk with an agreement to go immediately back to the trade regime that existed pre-trade war, could the pre-trade war economy have held up against the historic headwinds this one faces? I don’t suspect that I need to answer that question for you.
So, then, we’re back to last week’s weekly message titled What Others Think Others Are Going To Do... (definitely one to read if you didn't get a chance).
From the opening paragraph:
“Keynes suggested circa a century ago that trading (as opposed to, I'll say, investing in) markets is not about assessing fundamentals, it's about what traders think other traders are going to do.”Clearly, traders think other traders think that positive trade news is positive for stocks, because it was so during the latter stages of the previous expansion. Now throw in record Fed stimulus and you have to ask, what’s not to like about stocks right here?
Well, the operative, and critical, word above is “expansion”. “Expansion” denotes bull market conditions.
Services Sector Purchasing Managers Index
ISM Non-Manufacturing (services) Index
Mortgage Purchase Applications
ADP Non-Farm Payrolls Report
Challenger US Job Cuts Report
Weekly and Continuing Jobless Claims
Fed Balance Sheet
Today's stock market rally was a bit better in terms of the internals than the last couple I've featured herein. But still nothing that remotely screams bull market: click to enlarge...
In a nutshell: S&P 500 volume was below average (rally lacked conviction). NYSE up vs down volume was decent. S&P 500 and Nasdaq members advancing vs declining was decent as well. Members reaching yearly highs vs yearly lows was good. Members trading above their 200-day moving averages, lack thereof, remains bearish. The leadership on the day was interesting: Energy leading could be construed as a positive economic signal (although it'd have to morph into a new trend before we'd go there), however the volume was abysmal (27% below average). Gold outperforming stocks (+1.54% vs the S&P's +1.15%) would be construed as a negative economic signal (although it'd have to morph into a trend before we'd go there. Oh, wait, that has been the trend!).
Next to the performance ranking for each sector is the % of our current core allocation it represents. Note that gold represents our highest weighting, which of course reflects our present view of general conditions...
We'll leave it there for tonight.
Thanks for reading,